Governance and parameters
This page states plainly who can do what. The protocol has no token-holder voting. Authority is held by named roles with narrow scopes, the sensitive ones behind a multisig and a timelock, and every exercise of authority is an on-chain event anyone can audit.
The authority model
Authority is split into two tiers by temperature:
Operational keys run the protocol's daily loop, and each can do exactly one job: the attestor writes the weekly reserve report (inside its per-report band); the energy payer routes revenue payments into the yield split; the keeper pushes the price mirror to secondary networks; the monitor holds a single one-way power, pausing issuance. None of these keys can mint freely, reprice the reserve outside its band, change configuration, or upgrade code.
Governance keys, held by a multisig with upgrades additionally behind a timelock, set the risk configuration, manage roles, execute treasury operations, and authorize contract upgrades. The timelock makes the most powerful action, changing the code itself, publicly visible before it takes effect.
Hot keys with a narrow blast radius do the frequent work; cold, slow keys do the rare and dangerous work.
What governance cannot do
Several constraints bind the administrators themselves, in code:
The desk price is not a parameter. No role can mint above
min($1, C)or redeem below it. The pricing law is structural.Yield cannot outrun revenue. A distribution can never mint more than the payment that funded it, and cannot mint at all while the protocol is at or below par.
The risk configuration must be self-consistent. The five risk dials are written atomically, each within a bounded range, and the write reverts unless the sizing rule
C* ≥ 1 + design shock × energy ceilingholds: governance can move its risk appetite, but cannot declare one and configure another.The guards' own dials are bounded. Staleness windows and movement bands accept values only within fixed ranges, and every change emits an event. Widening a safety margin is possible; disabling one silently is not.
Reserve reports are banded. Even the attestation path cannot reprice the system in one step; corrections beyond the band require a governance action paired with a pause.
Parameters
The protocol's behavior is set by a small number of dials. The values below are the launch configuration. Each is governance-adjustable within its bounded range, expected to evolve with the portfolio (a young, concentrated Reserve warrants different settings than a diversified, mature one), and every change is recorded on-chain.
Collateral target C*
The over-collateralization level the yield split mean-reverts to
1.15
Recapitalization floor
The lowest C at which sub-par minting stays open; at 1.0 the desk is par-only
1.0 — window closed
Energy concentration ceiling
Maximum share of the Reserve in energy assets that acquisitions may not cross
dial; ~70/30 energy-to-liquid is the working composition target
Liquid floor
Minimum liquid sleeve that operator outflows must preserve
dial, paired with the above
Design shock
The declared combined revaluation the posture must absorb — the input to the sizing rule
10%
Redemption fee
Charged on exit; strictly above the report band so straddling a report is unprofitable
0.5%
Daily redemption limit
The queue rate that converts a redemption spike into an orderly sequence
1% of supply per day
Yield start
The collateral ratio at which staker distributions switch on
par
Reward vesting window
The period over which each distribution vests to stakers
30 days
Attestation cadence and band
How often the reserve value is reported, and the maximum routine move per report
weekly · 0.3%
Swap price P
The per-project recognition price that divides appreciation between investors and the buffer
set per project
Verifiability
The protocol's claims are checkable. The contracts are public; the configuration is readable on-chain at any time; every parameter change, report, pause, and upgrade emits an event; valuations are published with immutable versioned snapshots under a documented methodology; and the reserve's correspondence to real holdings is attested by an independent party. Where a guarantee is enforced by code, these pages say so; where it rests on management or custody practice, they say that instead.
Last updated
Was this helpful?

